top of page

Programming by example

Coding Made Easy

MisterTootor  M.S., B.S., A.S., A.S.B

mistertooter's

How cybersecurity breaches could infect the C++ programming language.

1. Buffer Overflows - Using strcpy() to copy user input into a fixed-size C-style array without bounds checking. Attackers can overwrite adjacent memory, causing crashes or arbitrary code execution.

​

2. Use of new and Manual Memory Management - Forgetting to delete memory allocated with new causes a memory leak. An attacker may exploit this to exhaust memory resources (denial of service).

​

3.Use-After-Free:

int* ptr = new int(5);
delete ptr;
std::cout << *ptr; // Use-after-free vulnerability.

4.Integer Overflows - A program validates file size with an expression like if (offset + length < buffer_size). If offset is large enough, the addition overflows, bypassing the check.​​​​​​​

​

5.Race Conditions - A program modifies a shared resource without proper locking mechanisms, causing a race condition that attackers can exploit to modify sensitive data.

​

6.Improper Exception Handling - An exception thrown in a destructor during stack unwinding could terminate the program, causing denial of service.

​

7.Vulnerable Use of STL - Using std::string to concatenate untrusted user input for SQL queries can result in SQL injection.

​

8.Insecure Polymorphism - An attacker overwrites a virtual table pointer (vtable) to redirect execution to malicious code.

​

9.Command Injection:

std::string command = "ls " + user_input;
system(command.c_str()); // User-controlled input leads to command injection.

​10.Deserialization Vulnerabilities - An attacker crafts a serialized object that, when deserialized, causes the program to execute malicious code.

​

11. Insecure Cryptography - Using an insecure random number generator (like rand()) for cryptographic purposes makes encryption predictable.

​

12. Weak Smart Pointer Management - Circular references between std::shared_ptr instances can lead to memory leaks                                                                                 

13. Insecure File Handling

​​​​

​​​14. Dependency Vulnerabilities - A linked library has a known buffer overflow vulnerability, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary code.

 

15. Out-of-Bounds Access:

​

std::ofstream ofs("/tmp/" + user_input); // Allows directory traversal attacks.

​16. Default Object Copying -  A class managing sensitive resources does not implement a custom copy constructor, leading to resource duplication or leaks.

​

17. Overloaded Operators - Overloaded + operator inadvertently allows integer overflow in arithmetic operations.

​

18. Privilege Escalation:

​

​​​​​​19. Misconfigured Threads:

 

std::vector<int> v(10);
int value = v[20]; // Out-of-bounds access, leading to undefined behavior.

​​​​​​​20. Lack of Boundary Checking

system("/bin/cp secret_file /tmp/"); // Command execution without validation.

std::thread t([] { /* Critical section */ });
t.
detach(); // No synchronization or error handling.

int arr[10];
arr[
11] = 42; // Buffer overflow due to lack of bounds checking.

Strategies to mitigate C++:

​

  • Implement strict input validation.

  • Use encrypted communication protocols.

  • Regularly update and patch libraries and systems.

  • Employ strong authentication and access control mechanisms.

  • Perform regular security audits and testing.

bottom of page